From: Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@...>
Date: 2006-09-22T23:34:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Would people use a rubyforge apt-get repository?

------=_Part_9272_3617786.1158935654451
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I think RubyGems should be The repository for ruby code, in the same way
CPAN is, or PEAR is trying to be, and I agree, using two different package
managers can get annoying.

Curious, what packages do you have to grab with apt vs gem?

Jason

On 9/22/06, John Turner <xennocide@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Just an idea that's been bouncing around my head...
>
> Using Ubuntu, there are some ruby libraries that you can download with
> apt-get, mostly core ones that aren't included in the ruby package itself.
>
> If rubyforge had a repository that could just be appended to
> sources.list and would allow ruby libraries (suitably (re?)named to
> avoid conflicts with other apt packages) which would allow downloading
> of any libraries on the site(as well as dependencies) it would just be
> kind of awesome.
>
> It bugs me a little that I'm installing ruby packages into two different
> locations using two different package managers.
>
> John
>
>

------=_Part_9272_3617786.1158935654451--