From: ara.t.howard@...
Date: 2006-09-22T01:12:22+09:00
Subject: Re: Ducktator - A Duck Type Validator

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Gregory Seidman wrote:

> Ruby's dynamism gives me even more flexibility, but I lose that contractual
> enforcement by static analysis. It's true that respond_to? is insufficient
> because it doesn't give me arity,

but it certainly can - it's up to you whether is does or does not.

food for thought...

-a
-- 
in order to be effective truth must penetrate like an arrow - and that is
likely to hurt. -- wei wu wei