From: Austin Ziegler Date: 2006-09-22T00:31:43+09:00 Subject: Re: Ducktator - A Duck Type Validator On 9/21/06, Gregory Seidman wrote: > Actually, it is the developer's responsibility to override respond_to? when > overriding method_missing. To do one and not the other is just sloppy. Maybe. I did point out that in my early days of programming Ruby, I would implement one without the other. But simply doing a #respond_to? check doesn't help you with arity checking, which matters as much as the presence of the method itself. -austin -- Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com * http://www.halostatue.ca/ * austin@halostatue.ca * http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/ * austin@zieglers.ca