From: Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>
Date: 2006-09-20T11:37:38+09:00
Subject: Re: Can not find superclass

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:27:47AM +0900, Yu Co wrote:
> Paul Lutus wrote:
> > Yu Co wrote:
> > 
> > / ...
> > 
> >> 
> >> Odd, isn't ?
> > 
> > Not, it's not odd, it means that, because you put "require 'super'" at 
> > the
> > top of the sub class file, the sub class found the super class, and you 
> > now
> > have an new problem. The new problem is the absence of:
> > 
> > require 'activerecord'
> > 
> > at the top of the super class file.
> > 
> > Before, the sub class couldn't find a definition for 'super'. Now super
> > can't find a definition for 'activerecord'.
> > 
> > Each Ruby source file that requires information from outside itself ... 
> > must
> > say so.
> 
> Many thanks for the response Paul,
> after putting "require 'activerecord'" at the top of the super class I 
> have now a new error message 
> "{RUBY_HOME}/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in 
> `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- activeRecord 
> (LoadError)"
> Do you know how to handle that?
> 
It's require 'active_record' (Note the underscore).
> 
> -- 
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.