From: Yu Co <djhackebeil@...>
Date: 2006-09-20T11:27:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Can not find superclass

Paul Lutus wrote:
> Yu Co wrote:
> 
> / ...
> 
>> 
>> Odd, isn't ?
> 
> Not, it's not odd, it means that, because you put "require 'super'" at 
> the
> top of the sub class file, the sub class found the super class, and you 
> now
> have an new problem. The new problem is the absence of:
> 
> require 'activerecord'
> 
> at the top of the super class file.
> 
> Before, the sub class couldn't find a definition for 'super'. Now super
> can't find a definition for 'activerecord'.
> 
> Each Ruby source file that requires information from outside itself ... 
> must
> say so.

Many thanks for the response Paul,
after putting "require 'activerecord'" at the top of the super class I 
have now a new error message 
"{RUBY_HOME}/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in 
`gem_original_require': no such file to load -- activeRecord 
(LoadError)"
Do you know how to handle that?


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.