From: Uncutstone Wu <uncutstone@...>
Date: 2006-09-18T14:18:06+09:00
Subject: Re: A idea about Ruby module, can we degrade a class to a mo

I know the example code is not very accurate. Acctually, the last 
snippet of code make more sense. As you said, a man is not always a 
teacher. So, rather than including Teacher into class Man, it's better 
to extend a Man object individually as in the following code.

        class Person
	end
	class Teacher
	end

	degrade_to_module Teacher # or something else,  this is imagined by me
.
	Class Man < Person
	End

	a_man = Man.new
	a_man.externd(Teacher)

But what I want to said acctually is not relative to these three class. 
You can just replace them as class A,B,and C. I think you may recognize 
that you have ever encounter this kind of modeling problems.

To some extent, it's relative to role modeling,for example, a man may 
play a teacher role. You can always use a delegator to implement a role. 
But I think if you can directly mix a degraded class into a object, the 
code will be more concise( you don't need write delegate methods),and 
the design will be clearer.

Thanks.

uncutstone


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.