From: Joan Iglesias Date: 2006-09-18T04:58:57+09:00 Subject: Re: the future of Ruby David Morton wrote: > > Run a test system with your unit tests. (You do have a formal testing > procedure, right?) > Yes I have. > Perl has had its own share of backwards compatibility issues. I > think it sounds like you are trying to find an excuse to block ruby > in your organization. Could you give me an example (perl)? I didn't find it. I'm quite new at this scriping languages, because until now I was a system administrator (bash). I'm not blocking nothing, because I work as a freelance consultant, and I would like to give to my clients some king of long term security in the product that they buy and mantein (in my case). I have heared your arguments, maybe you are right. I supose changes will be there allways, it's a matter of having a very good organitzation to respond to the changes as soon as possible... > > These same methods should have been employed by everyone who got > burned by the 1.1 release of rails. It's not that the changes were > all that big, but some simple testing would have eased the transition. > Can you give me a reference to the rails problem, please? Thank you. My projects, if I use Ruby, will work on Rails. > > David Morton > Maia Mailguard http://www.maiamailguard.com > mortonda@dgrmm.net > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFFDWZTUy30ODPkzl0RAv+eAJ9bqGiuHs0Z06ur+1g2yFoVG66MKgCgn7+I > 84bngsszv/cWzPATE5q27eA= > =oW2r > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.