From: Josef Wolf Date: 2006-09-18T02:31:30+09:00 Subject: Re: readline() with editing and history? On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:50:36AM +0900, Logan Capaldo wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:01:17PM +0900, Josef Wolf wrote: > > I have not tried his example because I assumed the library could not be > > loaded. I was confused by the fact that "require 'readline'" returns > > "false". Isn't require supposed to return "true" if successful? > The return value of require is borderline meaningless. If require > returns false, that just means that the file has already been require'd. Are you sure with this? I get false even on the _first_ require. > If it can't require the file for whatever reason it will raise and > exception, not return false. Maybe this should be mentioned in the documentation? Currently, it says: Ruby tries to load the library named _string_, returning +true+ if successful. [ ... ]