From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2006-09-14T06:19:02+09:00
Subject: Re: aggregated blogs on ruby:New site

On 9/13/06, Richard Turner <richardturner_2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> if you don't understand the purpose and usefulness of a blog aggregation
> ,then either read this
> http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=163105127&tid=13692
> http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000500.html
> http://www.cabalamat.org/weblog/art_92.html
> or forget about it

But also see:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.09/splogs.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_blog
http://www.blogmaverick.com/2005/08/15/a-splog-here-a-splog-there-pretty-soon-it-ads-up-and-we/
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,69380,00.html

I'm not sure wheter softloggger qualifies as a splog or not, but I'm suspicious.

Heck, I just spent most of the day carefully crafting an entry on my
blog, by hand.

-- 
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/