From: Lyle Johnson <lyle.johnson@...>
Date: 2006-09-14T02:37:23+09:00
Subject: Re: Wrapping a C Library: Allocation and duplication issues

On 9/13/06, Justin Bonnar <jbonnar@berkeley.edu> wrote:

> The RDF-Redland binding is outdated and decidedly un-ruby-like.  The
> other problem is the SWIG binding for Redland doesn't expose all of the
> functions I wanted to access.  In addition to wrapping Redland I need to
> get at some of the lower level functions from Rasqal.
>
> We're also planning on building an Ontology-aware level above Redland,
> with goals similar to that of the (now-defunct) Semitar project and want
> to get the lowerlevel code right before working on that.  Mixing the
> existing binding with higher-level C code would be a little ugly - we'd
> prefer to keep the lower level code in C.

Cool. I hope that you'll share when you're done. ;)