From: James Herdman <james.herdman@...>
Date: 2006-09-08T13:19:56+09:00
Subject: Re: Installing ROR with Darwin Ports

------=_Part_126529_24500333.1157689191318
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

We're getting a little tangential to the original topic at hand, but is your
call_stack code expected to be integrated directly into Breakpointer so that
this modified calling isn't necessary in the future (i.e. we can eventually
have usage like 'ruby script/breakpointer' again)?

James H

On 9/7/06, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:42:40PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:
> > On 9/7/06, Graham Wideman <notarealaddress@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > >James:
> > >Could you please clarify this:
> > >> Make sure you use Ruby 1.8.4.  Ruby 1.8.5 fixed a bug that was
> allowing
> > >> breakpointer to work.  You're going to use breakpointer a LOT in
> > >> developing in Rails.
> > >Are you saying that 1.8.5 broke breakpointer, hence we should use 1.8.4
> ?
> >
> > He's saying that breakpointer depended on a bug in Ruby 1.8. This bug
> > was fixed in Ruby 1.8.5. Breakpointer is being updated with a way to
> > work in Ruby 1.8.5, but it's not updated yet.
>
> I just released call_stack 0.1.0, which contains a workaround to use
> breakpointer with Ruby 1.8.5.
>
> http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?call_stack+0.1.0
>
> Once you've installed it, (either with the tarball or  gem install
> call_stack
> once the packages have propagated to the mirrors), you can proceed as
> usual,
> the only difference being that you have to run the application being
> debugged
> with
>
>   ruby -rbreakpoint185 script/server
>
> instead of
>
>   ruby script/server
>
> --
> Mauricio Fernandez  -   http://eigenclass.org   -  singular Ruby
>
>

------=_Part_126529_24500333.1157689191318--