From: Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>
Date: 2006-09-08T07:38:54+09:00
Subject: Re: get the name of a method's parameter


On Sep 7, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Matt Todd wrote:

>
>
> You may be right. Well, if so, then your solution works like a  
> charm. If
> not, then there's no solution.
>

My solution? I had no solutions, just random commentary. ;) (And  
there is of course the set_trace_func based solution combined with  
reading the source file)

> M.T.