From: "Suraj N. Kurapati" <skurapat@...>
Date: 2006-09-07T02:18:38+09:00
Subject: Re: How good is RDoc at documenting "raw" C++ code?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yvon Thoraval wrote:
> Le 6 sept. 06 � 18:38, Suraj N. Kurapati a �crit :
>> Doxygen is better suited for this task:
>> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
> 
> however, it seems to me, they are not speaking about ruby ???

Correct, they are not speaking of documenting Ruby. Instead, they
are speaking of using RDoc on C++ code.

Doxygen is better suited for C and C++.
RDoc is better suited for Ruby.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE/wLomV9O7RYnKMcRAlhOAJ9OYrL+dqL7STvU2Cv7ziBAJv2DEgCfcArF
1OAY8YaWhyz9ngcZ2Ee10c4=
=cgK4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----