From: Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>
Date: 2006-08-31T05:52:26+09:00
Subject: Re: rubyem [WAS rubyinline]


On Aug 29, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Trans wrote:

>
> Eric Hodel wrote:
>> On Aug 28, 2006, at 8:25 AM, Trans wrote:
>>
>>> Trans wrote:
>>>> Ryan Davis wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 25, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Trans wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I do have one pressing issue though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Me too! the name... RubyInline is alive and well-used so please
>>>>> don't
>>>>> camp on my project's name.
>>>>
>>>> Okay (for the third time).
>>>
>>> OKay, I think I'll call it RubyEmbedded with the shell command named
>>> 'rubyem'.  That work for everyone?
>>
>> Did you typo rubygems?
>
> Okay. I'll take that as a 'no'.
>
> I played around with some more names. 'rubyinlay' came to mind, and I
> almost settled on 'rubydemo', but that strays too far from test  
> usage I
> think, so now I'm thinking 'rubyhand', as in a helping hand and the
> comment block handle.
>
> T.
>
>

Ok I realize the ruby community has this penchant for clever names,  
but why not call it runcomments or similar?