From: Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>
Date: 2006-08-31T03:02:14+09:00
Subject: Re: [RCR] Array.step


On Aug 30, 2006, at 1:52 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

> Array.step(0,-4)
>     ==>[]                           # <- this one's wrong

I'd almost rather make the RCR for changing step rather than adding  
Array.step. It's more general, and with 1.9 magic iterators I think  
it would obviate the need to even have Array.step, e.g.: 1.step 
(3).to_a. Make n.step { ... } work as well and make it walk backwards  
if its from high to low.