From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2006-08-28T09:26:43+09:00
Subject: Re: Why Ruby does not nead an ide

R�rd Hinrichsen wrote:
> Am Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:48:36 +0900 schrieb Hal Fulton:
> 
>> I couldn't think of any paradigm that came before
>> "structured programming." GOTOful programming?
>> Unstructured programming?
> 
> Could "spaghetti code" be called a paradigm?
> 
> 
> R�rd
> 
> 
> 

Yes, indeed it could. And to add to my challenge, I asked for something
that everyone on this list would agree sucked. I personally am not
willing to agree to that. :)