From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2006-08-27T14:56:41+09:00
Subject: Re: Why Ruby does not nead an ide

Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 01:51:49PM +0900, julesjacobs@gmail.com wrote:
>> Emacs *is* an IDE. It just doesn't have "advanced" features like code
>> completion based on the type of the objects.
> 
> It's even more than an IDE.  It's an operating system.
> 
Ah ... but Forth is an assembler, language, interpreter, compiler, IDE
*and* an OS! Well ... it used to be an OS, anyhow. :) Sadly, there *is*
a set of Emacs bindings for Forth :(.