From: rak rok <rakrok@...>
Date: 2006-08-25T08:20:11+09:00
Subject: Re: do not understand this closure

------=_Part_109802_968138.1156461608844
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

>
> I think it's difficult. Ruby distinguishes between method names
> and variable names by how they are used. In this case, you'd be
> using the same name both ways.


Perhaps this could be an rcr?  I'm having trouble seeing why Ruby would
impose a syntactic difference between a proc and a method call.  It would be
nice syntactic sugar IMO.

-rr-

Hal
>
>

------=_Part_109802_968138.1156461608844--