From: Jim Weirich <jim@...>
Date: 2006-08-25T02:07:51+09:00
Subject: Re: Call functions of superclass

Morton Goldberg wrote:
> A more correct conclusion would have been that Ruby's 'super' should
> be regarded more as a method call rather than as a pseudo-variable
> (such as 'self'). This is quite different than the 'super' of
> Smalltalk and other object-oriented languages I have past experience
> with. 

Ruby follows Eiffel's lead in this regard.

-- Jim Weirich

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.