From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>
Date: 2006-08-22T08:09:48+09:00
Subject: Re: A use case for an ordered hash

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 gwtmp01@mac.com wrote:
>>
>> A literal syntax would be a bonus but of course would require a change
>> to core.
> 
> not if
> 
>   require 'orderedhash'
> 
> __replaces__ the builtin Hash

No, I think it would still require a core change -- because a
literal would get converted internally before we wanted it to,
right?


Hal