From: Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>
Date: 2006-08-13T13:57:12+09:00
Subject: Re: Defining Eigenclass


On Aug 12, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Trans wrote:

>
>> We could add some magic that every method matching /_class/ returns
>> the singleton class... :-)
>>
>> foo.eigen_class
>> foo.singleton_class
>> foo.ueber_class
>
> Hehe. That's fitting. Well, we could drop all pretenses
>
>   foo._class
>
> And call it the "under class".
>
> T.
>
>

Creepy. Earlier today I was thinking we could just call it _class in  
written communication and it could be the method name as well and  
everyone could "pronounce" it however they wanted <g>.