From: Tom Werner Date: 2006-08-12T02:15:41+09:00 Subject: Re: Defining Eigenclass ts wrote: > T> Indeed the source code tells us what it calls the thing (singleton > T> class), but should that forbid us from adopting a different, less > T> ambiguous term when writing about and discussing the concept? > > It's ambiguous only for you :-) If that were true, we wouldn't be having this discussion. =) Also, see the "nonce" thread going right now for others struggling with the less-than-stellarness of the currently used "singleton class". Tom -- Tom Werner Helmets to Hardhats Software Developer tom@helmetstohardhats.org www.helmetstohardhats.org