From: Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@...>
Date: 2006-08-11T22:32:16+09:00
Subject: Re: Cryptographic Signatures: Ruby versus OpenSSL

------=_Part_120757_5119127.1155303133430
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/11/06, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote: Could it be
that in your Ruby script you're missing out the equivalent

> step of "| openssl dgst -sha1 -binary \"?  I'd rather have expected
> something like



I think he's doing the Ruby part right. The OpenSSL code underneath the
Ruby  library-calls  automatically does the hashing for you, which is why
you have to give it a hash algorithm when generating an RSA sig. I think
something is wrong with how he's using rsautl.

------=_Part_120757_5119127.1155303133430--