From: darren kirby <bulliver@...>
Date: 2006-08-09T05:02:37+09:00
Subject: Re: Global variables considered harmful?

--nextPart1160735.9pGsJP0WdQ
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

quoth the Francis Cianfrocca:
> On 8/8/06, darren kirby <bulliver@badcomputer.org> wrote:
<snip>
>
> Look at optparse for a better way to do command line arguments. Look
> at OpenStruct for a better way to pass them around your program.

Hi,

I am already using getOptLong to parse the command line and it works fine, =
are=20
you saying that optparse is preferable here?

In any event, using a plain or open struct seems like a better way to go th=
an=20
using a class.

Thanks guys,
=2Dd
=2D-=20
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
=2D Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972

--nextPart1160735.9pGsJP0WdQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBE2O28wPD5Cr/3CJgRAl7kAJsGYtxI+MTeaH2SxI6oVErpjGVSRQCffaTA
3595YGsQCvZTxyCvI6STFhI=
=11JG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1160735.9pGsJP0WdQ--