From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2006-08-09T00:01:36+09:00
Subject: Re: Profiling Ruby Matrix operations

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Jan Svitok wrote:
>
>> It has to be noted though, that python's support seems to be the most
>> complete, and fortunately for us, ruby is supported pretty good as 
>> well. It
>> saved me a lot of work... the swig generated .cpp file has 5 MB!
>
> the problem with that being that math and science should repeatable and
> verifiable - neither of which are likely to be true when a 5mb 
> auto-generated
> file is in the mix...
>
> 2 cts.
>
> -a
I'm actually of the opinion that SWIG may not be necessary to interface 
GiNaC with Ruby ... it might be easier to do it directly.