From: Dr Nic <drnicwilliams@...>
Date: 2006-08-08T21:39:20+09:00
Subject: Re: method_missing to define_method

Matt Todd wrote:
> Given the circumstance that you don't want to explicitly predefine
> your methods for properties, etc, but that you're certain your
> parameters won't somehow change to affect your design, would it be
> beneficial to have method_missing define the method so that
> method_missing doesn't have to be called in case the property special
> method is called again?

Have a look in the ActiveRecord gem - it does a similar thing.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.