From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2006-08-04T07:08:17+09:00
Subject: Re: Creating Classes at runtime

------=_Part_95971_26123939.1154642894487
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/3/06, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov <ara.t.howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Robert Dober wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hmm but that still leaves the OP's  question unanswered, how can
> I  create
> > a  named class dynamically.
> >
> > eval "class #{x}; end"
> > myref2class =3D Object.const_get(x)
> >
> >
> > obviously does the job. ( I agree seems flawed to me too, but OP might
> have
> > his reasons )
> >
> > I had a quick look into class.c and it seems that rb_define_class is th=
e
> > only way to define the name of the class object, which would mean that
> eval
> > is the only way to do the trick.
> >
> > Any opinnions?
>
> i think we've come full circle, but you can do
>
>    c =3D Object.const_set 'C', Class.new{}
>
> i was just unsure it was actually needed


Thx I scr**** up on this one, thaught I had tested it. Defenitly nicer than
eval.
Well I guess that is what OP asked for, which does not necessairily mean  i=
t
is what he wanted. :(
or even less what he needed.

But it is what  I wanted :) to know
Thx again.
Cheers
Robert

cheers.
>
> -a
> --
> happiness is not something ready-made.  it comes from your own actions.
> - h.h. the 14th dali lama
>
>


--=20
Deux choses sont infinies : l'univers et la b=EAtise humaine ; en ce qui
concerne l'univers, je n'en ai pas acquis la certitude absolue.

- Albert Einstein

------=_Part_95971_26123939.1154642894487--