From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2006-08-04T00:26:39+09:00
Subject: Re: Next Major Version (was Re: Different semantics of Proc and method call -- bug or feature?)

On 8/2/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Next Major Version (was Re: Different semantics of Proc and method call -- bug or feature?)"
>     on Thu, 3 Aug 2006 00:38:41 +0900, "N Okia" <wrecklass1@gmail.com> writes:
>
> |In keeping with your current numbering scheme, does this mean there
> |will be a ruby 1.10 release?
>
> The version letters will be stay in one letter each, so that 1.a will
> be more likely than 1.10.
>
>                                                         matz.

Matz,

I hesitate to ask YOU this, but are you really sure you want to go that way.

Almost every software package I've run across keeps each level of the
version "number" as a number, so 1.10 would be much more in line with
standard practice than 1.a

--
Rick DeNatale