From: Alex Young <alex@...>
Date: 2006-08-03T20:54:14+09:00
Subject: Re: Array#size empties the Array??

Sven Suska wrote:
<snip>
>   Or, to put it directly:
>   Whenever rks.size was the _first_ method call on "rks",
>   the output was:
> [:rks_size, 0]
> [:rks_length, 0]
> [:rks_class, Array]
> [:rks_item, nil]
> [:rks_length, 0]
> [:rks_size, 0]
>    And the output was normal otherwise. (as posted in the beginning)
> 
>    Regardless of how many times a test method was repeated.
>    Regardless of the order of test methods. (When one method
>    contained the "corrupted" variant and the other did not.)
> 
> 
> This all stabilizes the hypothesis,
> that the Array#size method empties the array
> when called as the first method after the object obtained.
This may be irrelevant, but what's rks.class.ancestors?

-- 
Alex