From: Charles O Nutter <headius@...>
Date: 2006-08-03T14:20:35+09:00
Subject: Re: For performance, write it in OCaml

------=_Part_79087_19990509.1154582433099
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/2/06, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>
>         Compile Run
> C       0.137s  0.386s gcc -O3 -Wall
> OCaml   0.171s  0.668s ocamlopt
> OCaml   0.161s  0.626s ocamlopt -inline 100 -unsafe
> OCaml2  0.165s  0.415s ocamlopt
> OCaml2  0.165s  0.401s ocamlopt -unsafe
> Java    1.565s  1.688s javac
>

I assume this is the unmodified Java version...don't make me come over there
and smack you! :)

I'd be interested in seeing all of these run without IO as well...that was
the big bottleneck for Java.

Oh, and maybe Java 6 too? It's like 20-30% faster than Java 5...I don't know
how Sun does it.

-- 
Contribute to RubySpec! @ www.headius.com/rubyspec
Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
Ruby User @ ruby.mn
JRuby Developer @ www.jruby.org
Application Architect @ www.ventera.com

------=_Part_79087_19990509.1154582433099--