From: N Okia <wrecklass1@...>
Date: 2006-08-03T00:38:41+09:00
Subject: Re: Next Major Version (was Re: Different semantics of Proc and method call -- bug or feature?)

In keeping with your current numbering scheme, does this mean there
will be a ruby 1.10 release?

On 8/2/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Next Major Version (was Re: Different semantics of Proc and method call -- bug or feature?)"
>     on Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:14:32 +0900, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> writes:
>
> |On Aug 2, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> |
> |> It's a feature, but we are trying to fix it in the next major release
> |> (1.9 or 2.0).
> |
> |Matz, could you tell us why you are considering releasing the next
> |major version as 1.9 instead of 2.0?
>
> In the current pace, it would take years to release 2.0, but some
> requested features we already made in 1.9 branch.  We felt the request
> is reasonable.
>
>                                                         matz.
>
>