From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2006-08-02T20:35:20+09:00
Subject: Re: golfing Eratosthenes

------=_Part_69433_1880897.1154518517295
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/2/06, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > While that's an elegant looking solution it is not a 'true' sieve. It
> > builds up the primes array rather than eliminating non-primes from an
> > existing array.It's seems to be quite a bit slower:
>
>
> Well thank you, I forgot about the sieve, so there is no credit to be
> taken for that.
> But I am not sure to understand, by using (2..100) at the beginning I have
> the numbers, or is it kind of a generator which violates the rules? Anyway
> we could just do the same
>
----- 8< --------------

Did I get confused with replies here? If so all my appologizes,
I will do it again ;)

R.

------=_Part_69433_1880897.1154518517295--