From: Chad Perrin <perrin@...>
Date: 2006-08-02T11:25:54+09:00
Subject: Re: I thought this was the one that worked?

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:01:11AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
> 
> No, I meant that my comments about whether blocks were closures was
> hair-splitting.  (Maybe the fact that I introduced the comments that
> way looked like I was actually summing up what came before, but the
> hair-splitting pronouncement ended with a colon :-)

. . . so it was a complete non-sequitur?  Mea culpa.  I assumed that
comment had something to do with your response to me.  In fact, the
impression I got was that you were talking about the hair-splitting that
occurs in the differentiation between "gets something from this scope"
and "could get something from this scope", but then decided to introduce
more hair-splitting about something related -- but not strictly.

. . . which makes me wonder what you were actually saying about my
points, now.

-- 
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
unix virus: If you're using a unixlike OS, please forward
this to 20 others and erase your system partition.