From: Tim Bray <tbray@...>
Date: 2006-08-02T03:32:27+09:00
Subject: Re: UCS-2

Paul Battley wrote:
> However, are you sure you want UCS-2, and not its superset UTF-16? In
> my experience, specifying UCS-2 instead of UTF-16 is almost always a
> bug.
In fact, if you want to be pedantic (and when it comes to character 
encoding, pedantic is good) UCS-2 doesn't actually exist any more, last 
time I checked.  Paul is right, you really mean UTF-16. -Tim