From: Jamey Cribbs <cribbsj@...>
Date: 2006-07-26T21:47:26+09:00
Subject: Re: Mongoose 0.2.5 - The "Two Steps Forward, One Step Back" release

GFunk913@gmail.com wrote:
> I had a quick/vague question, wondering if you could shed any light on
> it.  Off the top of your head, how do you feel Mongoose would perform
> as the backend storage for an object persistance system, where the
> objects in question are very large (i.e. marshalling to disk creates a
> 40MB file)?
>
>   
Is each object 40MB?  (God, I hope not!)  Or are you saying that, the 
total size of all the objects saved to disk is 40MB?

If it's the latter, Mongoose might work just fine.  In a test run I had 
an 8MB file that had about 80,000 records (obviously, lots of small 
records).  Mongoose did a #find for a particular record, grabbed it, 
instantiated an object from the Marshaled data, and returned it to me, 
in something like 0.003 seconds.

A little more info on your data would help me give you a more accurate 
answer.

Jamey

Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email and any materials contained in any attachments is prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the intended recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender by email and destroy all copies of the original message, including attachments.