From: 7rans <transfire@...>
Date: 2006-07-25T21:55:02+09:00
Subject: Re: Meta-Meta-Programming, revisited


Erik Veenstra wrote:
> > More flexible and less "special". Seems like a good idea.
>
> What about |obj, method_name, args, block|? That one must be
> easy to remember, since it resembles the order of the call
> (object is the receiver).
>
> > Like the diagram btw.
>
> ;]
>
> Last night, I glanced over the front page of the programming
> section of Reddit, like I do every night. There it was: "Ruby
> Monitor-Functions, Or Meta-Meta-Programming in Ruby"! Very
> funny... ;]
>
> gegroet,
> Erik V. - http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  post_condition(:description) do |obj, method_name, args, block|
>    obj.instance_eval do
>      puts @text
>    end
>  end
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------

Very nice.

Not sure how the method_name parameter is useful, isn't it just
:description? In any case, the paraemters are nicely intuitive!

T.