From: Jeremy Tregunna <jtregunna@...>
Date: 2006-07-13T13:42:23+09:00
Subject: Re: prototype-0.1.0


On 12-Jul-06, at 10:45 PM, transfire@gmail.com wrote:

>
> Very nice!
>
> The only thing I see, is that your use of the term 'prototype' betrays
> a Class-based OOP background. Ie. You're usimg "prototype" as one  
> would
> "class" and "instantiate" them albiet via a deep clone. Using a  
> neutral
> term like 'object' does away with that.

That is the name of the model. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 
Prototype-based_programming

--
Jeremy Tregunna
jtregunna@blurgle.ca


"One serious obstacle to the adoption of good programming languages  
is the notion that everything has to be sacrificed for speed. In  
computer languages as in life, speed kills." -- Mike Vanier