From: transfire@...
Date: 2006-07-13T11:45:40+09:00
Subject: Re: prototype-0.1.0


Very nice!

The only thing I see, is that your use of the term 'prototype' betrays
a Class-based OOP background. Ie. You're usimg "prototype" as one would
"class" and "instantiate" them albiet via a deep clone. Using a neutral
term like 'object' does away with that.

  a = object{ a 1; b 2; c 3 }

T.