From: Marcelo <barberomarcelo@...>
Date: 2006-07-11T00:20:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Why Ruby over Python?

I also have seen:

http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?What_Classes_Are_Implemented_In_Wxruby

especially section: Classes missing in both TODO for wxruby2

I don't know if I have something more to see, so that's why I'm asking.

gregarican wrote:
> Have you actually read the feature list of both Wx projects to
> determine their completeness? Or are you just basing things on the fact
> that the wxRuby project hasn't been updated since late 2004? I wouldn't
> always base things solely on revision dates. There are some mature
> projects out there that aren't updated on a monthly basis.
>
> Marcelo wrote:
> > I would LOVE wxRuby when it is done.
> >
> > This is the last state, from SourceForge:
> >
> > Development Status: 4 - Beta
> > wxRuby	0.6.0  	November 21, 2004
> >
> > Not as near as wxPython 2.6.3.
> >
> > It's a shame.
> >
> > Marcin Mielzynski wrote:
> > > Marcelo wrote:
> > > > Oh, yes, I saw that page, but for what I saw, most of them are in early
> > > > development or dead. The only one apparently working is the Ruby/Gnome.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The most mature and the most feature-rich is FXRuby. I wrote my master
> > > degree using it. It was quite complex application using opengl and swig
> > > interfacing with c++. I had some minor problems with it. As can be seen
> > > from wxruby homepage, it is also under active development.
> > > 
> > > lopex