From: "Marcin Mielżyński" <lopx@...>
Date: 2006-07-09T08:55:12+09:00
Subject: Re: Sweet Lord!

Daniel Schierbeck wrote:
> William James wrote:
>> I didn't know that it would be faster; I only knew that using &block
>> is SO MUCH UGLIER!
> 
> That, my friend, is a matter of taste.
> 

There is nothing without a purpose. Consider an object method that takes 
a block and it doesn't want to execute it immediately. What would you do 
without a &block ?


lopex