From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-07-01T14:46:52+09:00
Subject: Re: can require 'date' be used in irb

On Jun 30, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Lothar Scholz wrote:

> Hello Logan,
>
> LC> On Jun 30, 2006, at 9:01 PM, dave rose wrote:
> LC> (What's happening is that date has already been required and  
> added to
> LC> $LOADED_FEATURES. But since you use the _full_ path to date it
>
> You are right, but i hope that somebody changes this in the future.
> Storing relative file paths should be forbidden. It's not that
> difficult in this case but it gets a real problem if it is relative to
> "." and some library code changes the current working directory.

1.9 stores full paths.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com