From: Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@...>
Date: 2006-06-26T22:12:16+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby and Java equality usage

On 6/26/06, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for confirming my point :-). I couldn't find a
>
>
> Hey you will get me into trouble, I did *not* agree with your point, I
> *accept* and *understand* it, my oppinion is not the only reasonable ;-)
> seriously I  think it is a feature, not the most important and maybe not the
> least dangerous but a feature nontheless.
> Cheers
> Robert
>

Sorry for this... pls blame me :-). I assume it is a feature, but till
I can figure it out how to use it for me it is just not-yet-a-feature
(no intention to sound harsh).

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
---
(http://themindstorms.blogspot.com)

> good/workable/meaningfull example for having different implementation
> > for == and eql?. I am still looking for.
> >
> > ./alex
> > --
> > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> > ---
> > (http://themindstorms.blogspot.com)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Deux choses sont infinies : l'univers et la b�tise humaine ; en ce qui
> concerne l'univers, je n'en ai pas acquis la certitude absolue.
>
> - Albert Einstein
>
>