From: Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
Date: 2006-06-24T07:49:27+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-prof-0.4.0

Good idea.  Changed checked into SVN - it will be in the next release.

Charlie

Eric Hodel wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Charlie Savage wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mauricio,
>>
>>> ... and found what is causing the problem. rcov's tests do something 
>>> like:
>>> batsman@tux-chan:~/mess/current$ cat ruby-prof-bomb.rb str = %{module 
>>> Foo; class Bar; def foo; end end end}
>>> eval str
>>> Foo::Bar.new.foo
>>> Object.class_eval{ remove_const :Foo }
>>> eval str
>>> Foo::Bar.new.foo
>>
>> Interesting, I never would have thought of that.  Your patch looks 
>> fine - I've applied it with a slight modification.  Results will now 
>> be output like this:
>>
>> Foo::Bar#foo
>> Foo::Bar#foo_1
>> Foo::Bar#foo_2
>> Foo::Bar#foo_3
>> etc...
>>
>> So you can tell the different calls apart.
> 
> How about:
> 
> Foo::Bar#foo
> Foo::Bar#foo-1
> foo::Bar#foo-2
> ...
> 
> Since foo_1 is a valid method name.
> 
> --Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
> This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant
> 
> http://trackmap.robotcoop.com
> 
> 
> 
>