From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-06-24T05:57:22+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-prof-0.4.0

On Jun 22, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Charlie Savage wrote:

> Hi Mauricio,
>
>> ... and found what is causing the problem. rcov's tests do  
>> something like:
>> batsman@tux-chan:~/mess/current$ cat ruby-prof-bomb.rb str = % 
>> {module Foo; class Bar; def foo; end end end}
>> eval str
>> Foo::Bar.new.foo
>> Object.class_eval{ remove_const :Foo }
>> eval str
>> Foo::Bar.new.foo
>
> Interesting, I never would have thought of that.  Your patch looks  
> fine - I've applied it with a slight modification.  Results will  
> now be output like this:
>
> Foo::Bar#foo
> Foo::Bar#foo_1
> Foo::Bar#foo_2
> Foo::Bar#foo_3
> etc...
>
> So you can tell the different calls apart.

How about:

Foo::Bar#foo
Foo::Bar#foo-1
foo::Bar#foo-2
...

Since foo_1 is a valid method name.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com