From: Eric Armstrong Date: 2006-06-24T05:19:28+09:00 Subject: Re: Surprise? ARGV[0] undefined after processing ARGF Ok. Thanks. Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, > > In message "Re: Surprise? ARGV[0] undefined after processing ARGF" > on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:19:00 +0900, Eric Armstrong writes: > |I found this behavior surprising. Is it > |intentional (and therefore something I need > |to understand better), or is it a bug: > > Intentional. Processed file names are removed from ARGV to tell you > how far you have done already. > > matz. >