From: Jeff Cohen <cohen.jeff@...>
Date: 2006-06-21T06:47:11+09:00
Subject: Re: Achieve pure object oriented design in Ruby

NAYAK wrote:
> A), there would be an overhead of adding a large number of wrapper 
> methods
> for members of classes B and C.

I haven't had time to think through it completely, but what if you 
overrode method_missing in A?  Your method_missing could find out if 
B.responds_to? the message, and if so, send() it the message along with 
the original arguments.

Just a thought.

Jeff
softiesonrails.com


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.