From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...>
Date: 2006-06-20T18:56:52+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Ruby2CExtension 0.1.0

Pit Capitain ha scritto:
> Ryan Davis schrieb:
> 
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Logan Capaldo wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 17, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Dominik Bathon wrote:
>>>
>>>> But RubyNode was just a by-product of Ruby2CExtension and it has a 
>>>> different interface than ParseTree.
>>>>
>>>> And Ruby2CExtension is not like Ruby2C, it's more like ZenObfuscate.
>>>>
>>>> Dominik
>>>
>>>
>>> MMm. I'll be honest, I was kind of disappointed. I was hoping for a 
>>> response like "Yes, but ParseTree has <X> limitation or uses <Y> 
>>> style, and RubyNode has a <Z> implementation" :). Ah well.
>>
>>
>> So were we.
>>
>> *shrug*
> 
> 
> If anyone is interested in working with Ruby's AST then it shouldn't be 
> too hard to look at the source code of both ParseTree and RubyNode. They 
> both depend on some C code and both seem to support Ruby 1.8.4 and 1.9. 
> What other features are you interested in?

don't we even have ripper, which is in the standard library?

-- 

blog en: http://www.riffraff.info
blog it: http://riffraff.blogsome.com
jabber : rff.rff at gmail dot com