From: James Britt Date: 2006-06-19T12:35:53+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby documentation (was Re: RUBY or (PHP5+PEAR+SMARTY)) Mat Schaffer wrote: > On Jun 18, 2006, at 8:12 PM, James Britt wrote: > >> Mat Schaffer wrote: >> >>> IMHO, part of the reason PHP's documentation is great is that it's >>> not auto-generated. Tools are great, but they lack a certain >>> element that a flesh-and-blood editor provides. A ruby >>> documentation team would be a great thing. >> >> >> Hey, what a great idea. >> >> :) >> >>> On that note, I like to write. Is anyone actively working on core >>> ruby documentation? If so, I'd like to help. If not, consider >>> this a call to action! :) >> >> >> Please see http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib/status.html >> >> And thank you. > > > Oh cool. Sorry for my R-ingTFM first there. I suppose I'll grab a CVS > copy and give it a shot! Sweet. Thanks. Some quick tips: There is a ruby-doc mailing list for questions about doc'ing Ruby, and when you have something, but no contact person to send it to, make a patch of your doc changes and post it on the ruby-core list (yes, Yet Another Mailing List). http://ruby-doc.org/about for r-d list info Thanks again, -- James Britt "You harmonize; then you customize." - Wilson Pickett