From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2006-06-18T01:09:25+09:00
Subject: Re: Cut-based AOP

Simen Edvardsen wrote:
>> > I have yet to need AOP in Ruby. Of any sort.
>>
>> Well, saying that is sort-of like programming Turbo Pascal in the 80's
>> and saying "I have yet to need OOP".
> Well, you could just go Functional Programming All the Way (tm). Not
> my preference, but still.
Hmmm ... pure functional programming? I could live with that. :)

-- 
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

http://linuxcapacityplanning.com