From: Dmitrii Dimandt <dmitriid@...>
Date: 2006-06-17T21:29:39+09:00
Subject: Re: Unicode roadmap?

> If you can point to an official and *current* standard which proves me
> false an my statement of 1-4 bytes per plain UTF-8 encoded character,
> I'll concede my point. Please don't bring in combining characters,
> you know what I mean by now. If you like, s/character/code point/g.

You are correct. And why Wikipedia? www.unicode.org has it all:
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr17/#CharacterEncodingForm and
following


> Merely pointing to a concise and actually well written Wikipedia
> article with a nice summary is way more informative than using
> obsoleted RFCs to reinforce one's own argument. Besides, we all know
> how relyable Wikipedia is. End of discussion from my side.
>
> J�rgen
>
> --
>  The box said it requires Windows 95 or better so I installed Linux
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEVAwUBRJPbH/y64gyiEfXtAQIi5AgAgUxBv/QN5OItmrWxODCe1HOaaNKKPJPT
> ZF5zljWsaBOXfd7jptSe12y8S4jJzGQ8mApl14DypMr6c3A+K51oTqRo7pNnDq3y
> Mi/64ycxledzN3V3ibSh+TthCUgk6JGI2WMv0SobiCBAHeNaffkFezfufMSLgCvh
> S6l8EKtdX5Zitu/MH5akjR/Wcor1qivE9Sx4I7pyVfL4ITxZy9RL1A/NEIf7oJaq
> 8I2VCxk1D1qTiKXiInCNsN7r7ae5nsm4DwLgOiEV2UXg/gLn4E+TxbGHRCgGIMQz
> C6MFmuC0SVGrjoUpyzis6GevZJXm5i/Ei06Izy42Xae4+OKKV6yEYg==
> =wAgI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>